In today’s Washington Post Ted Koppel captures so much of why we have struggled to live up to our ideals since 9/11/2001, suggesting that Osama bin Laden couldn’t have hoped for a more damaging response on our part: two wars that have cost us so dearly in lives, ours, our allies, Iraqis and Afghanis; over a trillion spent on these wars; and a growing meanness that has included the reification of fear in terms like evil-doers, Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, and now, in its latest manifestation, the Qu’ran and Islamic mosques.  As Koppel concludes:

We have raced to Afghanistan and Iraq, and more recently to Yemen and Somalia; we have created a swollen national security apparatus; and we are so absorbed in our own fury and so oblivious to our enemy’s intentions that we inflate the building of an Islamic center in Lower Manhattan into a national debate and watch, helpless, while a minister in Florida outrages even our friends in the Islamic world by threatening to burn copies of the Koran.

If bin Laden did not foresee all this, then he quickly came to understand it. In a 2004 video message, he boasted about leading America on the path to self-destruction. “All we have to do is send two mujaheddin . . . to raise a small piece of cloth on which is written ‘al-Qaeda’ in order to make the generals race there, to cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses.”

Through the initial spending of a few hundred thousand dollars, training and then sacrificing 19 of his foot soldiers, bin Laden has watched his relatively tiny and all but anonymous organization of a few hundred zealots turn into the most recognized international franchise since McDonald’s. Could any enemy of the United States have achieved more with less?

Could bin Laden, in his wildest imaginings, have hoped to provoke greater chaos? It is past time to reflect on what our enemy sought, and still seeks, to accomplish — and how we have accommodated him.